| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Post-escalation Incursion Changes - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Problem: RIsk/Reward scaling Null Sec/High Sec Solution: Is as simple as it would be painfull to Incrusion farmers. Make incursions a low sec ONLY event with high rewards. It would also help to revive low sec btw.
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.05.11 15:13:00
|
2. Sticky:Armor / shield rig changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
nothing here
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.04.23 21:19:00
|
3. Sticky:Armor / shield rig changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: We would like to discuss possible changes to Armor / Shield rigs for Inferno. It would be the first of many steps to rebalance active versus passive tanking, and promote usefulness of active tanking in small, mobile combat...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.04.23 20:53:00
|
4. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: OK, so the approach we're currently considering is: - Probably keep the lock count reduction on general principles To what purpose? You can easily circumvent it by fitting a certain module in your high slots. Quote: ...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.04.03 17:04:00
|
5. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: Also, further clarification: This EW-immunity stuff is something we're *exploring*. This discussion is part of that exploration. The specific benefits I'm hoping it might yield at this time aren't really to do with warp s...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 18:30:00
|
6. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: Not a a bonus to WCS, but rather a built-in thing like Blockade Runners have, so they're more vulnerable to tackling but can't be tackled by a single rifter, because that would be too big a balance swing for us to be comf...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 11:36:00
|
7. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ivana Twinkle wrote: CCP Navigator wrote: Following the Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012, an incident was broadcast live on air by a panelist during the Q&A which broke the EVE Online EULA/TOS. The panelist was a member of the CSM who has ...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 09:32:00
|
8. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Why is Mittens not posting in this thread? oh wait.....
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 09:09:00
|
9. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: John Maynard Keynes wrote: Then bust it is.. for the goons... You do not want to know how things end when we go "bust" friend Lol, u are not as important as u believe to be...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:41:00
|
10. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Andski wrote: The only appropriate solution is to either leave Mittani on the council or start a new election. Disenfranchising a vocal group of players with 10,058 - 20% of the voting base - accounts betwe...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:35:00
|
11. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: The only appropriate solution is to either leave Mittani on the council or start a new election. Disenfranchising a vocal group of players with 10,058 - 20% of the voting base - accounts between them is never, ever acceptable. ...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:33:00
|
12. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: John Maynard Keynes wrote: Andski wrote: 10,058 paying customers totally ignored and disenfranchised. Good work, CCP. U mad? oh look another worthless npc alt So u still mad?
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:30:00
|
13. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Leykan wrote: MeBiatch wrote: sweet using logical fallacies to avoid the fact that i am right! Still waiting on you to explain the whole TOS applicable in a RL situation thing here... fanfest feed i...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:22:00
|
14. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So many delicious Goon tears... Give me more...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.29 00:04:00
|
15. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rick Maken wrote: Storm in a tea cup, not a day goes by when I don't hear the words kill yourself in University or online. Sperging publords making a massive shitstorm over literally nothing have ruined the CSM, and potentially ruined the game...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.28 23:32:00
|
16. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Andski wrote: 10,058 paying customers totally ignored and disenfranchised. Good work, CCP. U mad?
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.28 23:30:00
|
17. My Apology - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Mittani wrote: This has been hanging over my head since Thursday when I stumbled away from the Alliance Panel with a vague sense that I had done something horrible. I didn't know the extent of how much of a shitheel I had been until today, ...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.27 00:43:00
|
18. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Andski wrote: John Maynard Keynes wrote: forator2 wrote: what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, ...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.25 18:14:00
|
19. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
forator2 wrote: what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anythin...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.24 12:23:00
|
20. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Snot Shot wrote: Welp..........I gots more "Likes" than the two of you combined so I think I'm a pretty good poaster.........and my mom says thats all that counts..... Hey I got more CFC kills in EC- today............you guize are fun to farm...
- by John Maynard Keynes - at 2012.03.23 16:34:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |